{"id":6939,"date":"2014-05-14T09:20:24","date_gmt":"2014-05-14T13:20:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theweekinimaging.com\/?p=6939"},"modified":"2014-05-14T09:21:20","modified_gmt":"2014-05-14T13:21:20","slug":"the-25-most-significant-events-in-the-office-imaging-industry-of-the-past-25-years-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/feature-articles\/2014\/05\/the-25-most-significant-events-in-the-office-imaging-industry-of-the-past-25-years-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The 25 Most Significant Events in the Office Imaging Industry of the Past 25 Years Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome back to another round of the office imaging industry\u2019s most significant events of the past 25 years. It\u2019s been quite the ride, a ride that shows no signs of abating. No doubt about it, the past 25 years have been some of the most exciting in the industry with ups and downs, major developments, channel changes, and product introductions that have made a significant difference\u2014positively and negatively\u2014to the bottom lines of many players no matter where they\u2019re perched in the channel or in the industry.<\/p>\n<p>With that in mind, let\u2019s look at five more events that have had an impact on this industry during the past 25 years.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/mps-cutting-costs.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-6940\" src=\"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/mps-cutting-costs.jpg\" alt=\"mps cutting costs\" width=\"300\" height=\"256\" \/><\/a>Managed Print Services Becomes \u201cThe Next \u201cBig Thing\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>That cost per copy concept that was one of our significant events in last week\u2019s edition would eventually evolve into Managed Print Services (MPS) as dealers now had a strategy, albeit one that some are still trying to figure out, for taking over the service and supplies replenishment for their customer\u2019s printer fleets.\u00a0As Hunter McCarty of RJ Young in Nashville, TN, recalls, \u201cThis was difficult at first and although the model of a break-fix fit, there were still challenges in how to price the program and get customers to realize what they were spending on printers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In McCarty\u2019s view, the 2009 economic downturn helped speed up the acceptance of MPS as customers began to look at all expenses and realized that the number of printers in their organization was out of control as was what they were spending on them.\u00a0\u201cDealers were able to help the customer understand the total cost of ownership and wrap a program around the fleet that would not only minimize costs, but help control expenses,\u201d says McCarty. \u201cFor the dealer in many cases the volumes picked up on printers offset the loss in volumes on the MFP.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>While some in the industry feel that this MPS horse has been beaten to within an inch of its life and has been supplanted as \u201cThe Next Big Thing\u201d by Managed Services or Managed IT Services, it\u2019s not going away and even thought it\u2019s no longer \u201cThe Next Big Thing,\u201d it\u2019s still a big thing for the office imaging industry.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/consolidation.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-6941\" src=\"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/consolidation.jpg\" alt=\"consolidation\" width=\"275\" height=\"183\" \/><\/a>Consolidation in the Dealer Community<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cDealer consolidation has had one of the biggest impacts on the copier\/imaging business,\u201d opines John Hey of Strategic Business Associates (SBA). \u201cStarting with Alco (which acquired my dealership in Minneapolis), Hillman, Danka, and Erskine House, role-up strategies initially provided liquidity for dealer owners, growth partners for manufacturers, and favorable returns for the shareholders of the acquiring companies. When Alco became IKON, the game changed. Some manufacturer relationships were disrupted and many talented people headed for the exits. Then the sale of IKON to Ricoh caused the manufacturers to further strengthen their direct distribution. Global Imaging was the hold out but their sale to Xerox only hardened direct distribution plans by the manufacturers. The independent dealer still has great opportunities, but dealers must be larger and more sophisticated to compete.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>All one has to do is look at the ranks of BTA dealer members and that\u2019s proof enough that the office technology dealer community doesn\u2019t exactly have the same strength in numbers as it did 25 years ago. After the mega dealers were done with their acquisitions (and making a lot of dealers who sold out in the process extremely wealthy), we saw a fair amount of dealers who sold out return and open new dealerships. Now we\u2019re seeing a survival of the fittest trend with larger dealerships acquiring smaller ones as well as OEMs continuing to strengthen their distribution through dealer acquisitions even though it\u2019s not on the scale they were buying a few years ago.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/blocks-falling-over.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-6942\" src=\"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/blocks-falling-over-227x300.jpeg\" alt=\"blocks falling over\" width=\"227\" height=\"300\" \/><\/a>The Rise and Fall of the Mega Dealer Channel<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Following up on John Hey\u2019s comments on consolidation in the dealer channel, about It\u2019s impossible to minimize the effect that IKON, Danka, and Global Imaging Systems have had on the office imaging industry. They\u2019ve had a tremendous impact on the independent dealer landscape and for a time seemed omnipotent. Indeed, there were concerns in some circles that this was the end of the independent dealer channel as we knew it even if many independents never got that memo and continued to grow in this strange new world of office technology distribution. As fortune would have it, none of these organizations turned out to be omnipotent, the independent dealer channel is still viable, and that mega dealer channel as it once existed is no more, swallowed up for better or for worse by the likes of Konica Minolta, Ricoh, and Xerox although one can argue that Global still seems to have its #%&amp;* together.\u00a0 Regardless, those organizations had a major impact on the industry, one that still reverberates today.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/think-out-of-the-box.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-6943\" src=\"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/think-out-of-the-box-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"think-out-of-the-box\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/a>Solutions Move the Sale and the Sales Pitch Beyond the Box<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Make no mistake about it a box selling mentality still pervades the industry as does a continued emphasis from thought leaders and even the OEMs about how the industry must focus on selling solutions. \u00a0For sure, solutions are a key component of many box sales these days, especially when incorporated into the sale from the outset. That\u2019s not to say solutions, i.e. software, are anywhere close to dominating in this industry. \u201cIf you look at software sales, the percentage of the sales is still relatively small,\u201d notes Global Imaging\u2019s Mike Pietrunti. \u201cI\u2019m not sure why; it\u2019s [called] applications now, and I know everybody is selling them, and we\u2019re selling them, but on a percent of total business it\u2019s small and that\u2019s probably because the manufacturers don\u2019t really [develop] the software.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Solutions selling isn\u2019t a new concept, we\u2019ve been hearing about it for well over a decade now, but that hasn\u2019t stopped many in the channel from raising the issue or saying that\u2019s how they sell now even if there continues to be a mad rush at the end of the month to hit those hardware quotas. Still one can\u2019t underestimate the importance that software plays today compared to 25 years ago. Consider the wealth of partnerships between software companies and OEMs, dealers who have developed their own software, and how having a document management, workflow, or some other type of solution available to customers is the sign of a progressive office imaging dealership in 2015 and a potential source of differentiation.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/global_imaging_logo.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-6945\" src=\"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/global_imaging_logo.jpg\" alt=\"global_imaging_logo\" width=\"200\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a>The Popularity of the Global Benchmark Model<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Some call it the Global Benchmark model, others the Tom Johnson model, but whatever you call it, it\u2019s a model that\u2019s been used by hundreds and hundreds of dealers to help manage and grow their dealerships over the years. \u201cThat operating metric model that dealers have adopted, either entirely or in a different form, has kept this industry somewhat healthy,\u201d maintains office imaging veteran Harry Hecht. \u201cIt\u2019s helped those dealers doing well, do better and those who haven\u2019t, they\u2019re feeling it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome back to another round of the office imaging industry\u2019s most significant events of the past 25 years. It\u2019s been quite the ride, a ride that shows no signs of abating. No doubt about it, the past 25 years have been some of the most exciting in the industry with ups and downs, major developments, channel changes, and product introductions that have made a significant difference\u2014positively and negatively\u2014to the bottom lines of many players no matter where they\u2019re perched in the channel or in the industry. With that in mind, let\u2019s look at five more events that have had an impact on this industry during the past 25 years. Managed Print Services Becomes \u201cThe Next \u201cBig Thing\u201d That cost per copy concept that was one of our significant events in last week\u2019s edition would eventually evolve into Managed Print Services (MPS) as dealers now had a strategy, albeit one that some are still trying to figure out, for taking over the service and supplies replenishment for their customer\u2019s printer fleets.\u00a0As Hunter McCarty of RJ Young in Nashville, TN, recalls, \u201cThis was difficult at first and although the model of a break-fix fit, there were still challenges in how to price the program and get customers to realize what they were spending on printers.\u201d In McCarty\u2019s view, the 2009 economic downturn helped speed up the acceptance of MPS as customers began to look at all expenses and realized that the number of printers in their organization was out of control as was what they were spending on them.\u00a0\u201cDealers were able to help the customer understand the total cost of ownership and wrap a program around the fleet that would not only minimize costs, but help control expenses,\u201d says McCarty. \u201cFor the dealer in many cases the volumes picked up on printers offset the loss in volumes on the MFP.\u201d While some in the industry feel that this MPS horse has been beaten to within an inch of its life and has been supplanted as \u201cThe Next Big Thing\u201d by Managed Services or Managed IT Services, it\u2019s not going away and even thought it\u2019s no longer \u201cThe Next Big Thing,\u201d it\u2019s still a big thing for the office imaging industry. Consolidation in the Dealer Community \u201cDealer consolidation has had one of the biggest impacts on the copier\/imaging business,\u201d opines John Hey of Strategic Business Associates (SBA). \u201cStarting with Alco (which acquired my dealership in Minneapolis), Hillman, Danka, and Erskine House, role-up strategies initially provided liquidity for dealer owners, growth partners for manufacturers, and favorable returns for the shareholders of the acquiring companies. When Alco became IKON, the game changed. Some manufacturer relationships were disrupted and many talented people headed for the exits. Then the sale of IKON to Ricoh caused the manufacturers to further strengthen their direct distribution. Global Imaging was the hold out but their sale to Xerox only hardened direct distribution plans by the manufacturers. The independent dealer still has great opportunities, but dealers must be larger and more sophisticated to compete.\u201d All one has to do is look at the ranks of BTA dealer members and that\u2019s proof enough that the office technology dealer community doesn\u2019t exactly have the same strength in numbers as it did 25 years ago. After the mega dealers were done with their acquisitions (and making a lot of dealers who sold out in the process extremely wealthy), we saw a fair amount of dealers who sold out return and open new dealerships. Now we\u2019re seeing a survival of the fittest trend with larger dealerships acquiring smaller ones as well as OEMs continuing to strengthen their distribution through dealer acquisitions even though it\u2019s not on the scale they were buying a few years ago. The Rise and Fall of the Mega Dealer Channel Following up on John Hey\u2019s comments on consolidation in the dealer channel, about It\u2019s impossible to minimize the effect that IKON, Danka, and Global Imaging Systems have had on the office imaging industry. They\u2019ve had a tremendous impact on the independent dealer landscape and for a time seemed omnipotent. Indeed, there were concerns in some circles that this was the end of the independent dealer channel as we knew it even if many independents never got that memo and continued to grow in this strange new world of office technology distribution. As fortune would have it, none of these organizations turned out to be omnipotent, the independent dealer channel is still viable, and that mega dealer channel as it once existed is no more, swallowed up for better or for worse by the likes of Konica Minolta, Ricoh, and Xerox although one can argue that Global still seems to have its #%&amp;* together.\u00a0 Regardless, those organizations had a major impact on the industry, one that still reverberates today. Solutions Move the Sale and the Sales Pitch Beyond the Box Make no mistake about it a box selling mentality still pervades the industry as does a continued emphasis from thought leaders and even the OEMs about how the industry must focus on selling solutions. \u00a0For sure, solutions are a key component of many box sales these days, especially when incorporated into the sale from the outset. That\u2019s not to say solutions, i.e. software, are anywhere close to dominating in this industry. \u201cIf you look at software sales, the percentage of the sales is still relatively small,\u201d notes Global Imaging\u2019s Mike Pietrunti. \u201cI\u2019m not sure why; it\u2019s [called] applications now, and I know everybody is selling them, and we\u2019re selling them, but on a percent of total business it\u2019s small and that\u2019s probably because the manufacturers don\u2019t really [develop] the software.\u201d Solutions selling isn\u2019t a new concept, we\u2019ve been hearing about it for well over a decade now, but that hasn\u2019t stopped many in the channel from raising the issue or saying that\u2019s how they sell now even if there continues to be a mad rush at the end of the month to hit those hardware quotas. Still one can\u2019t underestimate the importance that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[82],"tags":[1413,1412,202,1385,385,521,236,1386,2409,274,275,501,1414],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6939"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6939"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6939\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6946,"href":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6939\/revisions\/6946"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6939"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6939"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.enxmag.com\/twii\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6939"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}