It seems as
though every article in the current trade publications
references Managed Print Services in one form or another. Yes,
even we at Industry Analysts have been known to jump on that
editorial bandwagon more than a few times. But I’ve seen so
much hype on the subject that I feel compelled to dispel some
myths and express a few serious concerns.
For those living in a cave Managed Print Services (MPS) is
said to be the “next big thing” for dealers. Read the blogs
and you’ll find profits are huge, you’ll lock out competition,
you’ll be the best buddy of the IT manager, you’ll build an
annuity, new software has simplified the process, etc., etc.
Let’s take a closer look at some of the assumptions
surrounding these programs. Myth or Fact?
I can integrate an MPS strategy into my existing sales force.
They’ll appreciate the extra commission opportunities.
Myth: Dealers using dedicated sales reps specifically
for MPS report significantly higher rates of success than
those attempting to force the existing reps to wear two hats.
The primary objective of your current sales force is to place
boxes – period. The objective of the MPS rep is to generate
pages. An MPS engagement can run its entire course without a
single hardware sale. You’re building a goal conflict when you
ask the same rep to wear two hats.
MPS is nothing new. We used to call it a CPC program. I don’t
understand the hype.
Myth: MPS could not be more different from the CPC
plans we all know and love. The most significant difference
lies in the fact that a CPC plan bundles service, supplies and
hardware for equipment sold by you. MPS plans bundle service
and supplies of a hardware fleet generally sold by someone
else. In addition, MPS engagements include other activities
not normally included in a CPC contract, such as fleet
consoli-dation, workflow assessment, mapping, etc.
The fact that the fleet you are about to service has been sold
by someone else means that you are likely to face pushback
from the original sales organization. This may be lurking,
waiting to rip your throat out at the last possible minute.
MPS is nothing more than selling supplies and providing
service to an existing fleet of printers.
Myth: Providing printer service in exchange for supplies is
only the first step. Next, you want to right size the fleet in
order to reduce the amount of (hopefully competitive) hardware
installed. In theory, less hardware means lower cost. In the
third phase, you’ll have to be prepared to adjust existing
workflows to increase efficiencies.
I can avoid complexity by finding prospects interested in just
the first phase. After all, that’s where instant savings
reside.
Fact: Yes, you can sell only the initial savings
associated with the implementation of an MPS program. But, if
you’ve sold the contract on the basis of price, with no value
add, you’ll probably lose it on that same basis at the end of
the contract. Someone will always be there to sell for less.
One of the best parts of an MPS engagement is predictable cost
for both the customer and my dealership.
Myth: Yes, your customer’s cost is predictable. But
yours is not. When you calculated the original contract, did
you factor in the cost of refreshing the fleet? What about the
additional cost of supplies and service when the customer
begins to produce pages with a higher coverage than originally
assumed? Your costs will tend to escalate throughout the
course of the contract. Be certain you have considered these
at the outset.
If the customer chooses not to renew the contract, I can
simply walk away.
HUGE Myth: We hardly see this discussed. Yet the issue
sits there like a ticking time bomb. When you initially took
over the fleet, all of the equipment belonged to the customer.
Gradually, over the life of the contract, you have probably
refreshed all or part of the fleet. So, here’s the big
question. Who owns the new equipment? Has this been called out
at the time the contract is signed? If another vendor takes
over the contract, does your equipment pass to them and if so,
at what cost?
Gross margins for MPS contracts tend to be higher than the
blended margin for hardware, service and supplies.
True (for now): Yes, our research indicates that
current MPS margins are considerably higher. But, as more
vendors enter the field you can expect those margins to
narrow. Your best bet might lie in adding value such as
workflow analysis to tie you to the account for a longer, more
profitable period.
Lou
Slawetsky is CEO of Industry Analysts, Inc., a marketing and
management consulting firm for the office automation industry.
Much of the company’s research and testing results can be
viewed on their website
www.industryanalysts.com.